The article discusses research conducted since 2019 by the Club [PHI]. The assumptions of the research method result from aesthetic evolutionism and concern the atavism inherent in the mecha-nism of evaluating the perceived form. The existential challenges, repeated for many generations of homo sapiens, have improved the human eye. Our ancestors, encountering an unknown form, espe-cially a living one, had to guess the potential effect of the encounter. In critical for survival situations, it was crucial to read both the potency and intentions of the encountered individual. The assessment of each appearing object had to be made immediately, from a distance that still allowed escape if the intentions of the observed individual turned out to be hostile. It is to this that the anatomy of the human eye has adapted in the course of evolution, creating our field of vision as a system of zones. Each zone simultaneously isolates the relevant fragments of the observed form, automatically com-bined by the interpreting brain into a meaningful whole. This subconscious mechanism of the de-composition of form on the retina allows us to read what the genius loci implanted in space tells us.